Clinical Reflection: The Stability of Suffering

TRACK_TITLE

0:00 0:00

What Long-Term Psychotherapy Taught Me About Change

By Ari Sotiriou MA PGDip psychodynamic psychotherapist

The Systems We Learn to Live Inside

When people first contact a psychotherapist, they often tell us they want to change.

They want the anxiety to stop. They want to stop choosing the wrong partners. They want to feel less lonely, less angry, less frightened of being abandoned, or less driven by an inner voice that tells them they are never quite good enough.

They arrive hoping that therapy will help them become someone different.

Over the years I have learned that this is both true and not quite true.

People certainly want relief from suffering. But the emotional systems that create that suffering are often remarkably reluctant to change. They have not survived by accident. They have been built, gradually and often invisibly, to keep a person emotionally alive.

Long before I became a psychotherapist, I spent my professional life trying to understand another kind of stability.

As an electrical engineer, I worked on control strategies for inherently unstable systems. One project involved the theoretical control of an electromagnetically suspended train. Left to itself, the train could not remain suspended. Tiny disturbances, almost imperceptible, would rapidly grow until the entire system became unstable. Only continuous feedback allowed equilibrium to exist.

Later, working with high-speed semiconductor systems and telecommunications technology, I found myself helping engineers solve complex problems. My role was rarely to provide immediate answers. More often, it involved listening carefully to understand how they had come to see the problem before suggesting another way of thinking about it.

At the time, I believed I had left engineering behind.

Only years later, sitting quietly with patients, did I begin to realise that I had not.

The language had changed.

The mathematics had disappeared.

But the fascination with complex systems remained.

Human beings are, in many ways, extraordinary self-organising systems. We are constantly adapting to experiences, relationships and losses. We learn patterns that allow us to survive environments we never chose. Over time, those patterns become so familiar that they no longer feel like adaptations. They simply feel like who we are.

The child who discovers that expressing anger leads to rejection may grow into the adult who cannot recognise their own resentment.

The child who learns that love must be earned through achievement may become the successful professional who never experiences satisfaction.

Someone who grew up expecting emotional unpredictability may find calm relationships strangely unsettling while feeling irresistibly drawn towards people who recreate familiar uncertainty.

From the outside these choices appear irrational.

From the inside they often feel inevitable.

British psychoanalytic thinking has long understood that much of emotional life develops outside conscious awareness. Donald Winnicott wrote about the environments that allow a self to emerge naturally and those that require a child to organise themselves around adaptation instead. Wilfred Bion described the importance of another mind that can receive unbearable emotional experience, digest it and return it in a form that becomes thinkable.

Neither writer suggested that people consciously choose these ways of being.

Rather, they recognised that emotional life is shaped through countless interactions that occur long before language is available to describe them.

By adulthood these patterns have become remarkably stable.

This is one of the paradoxes that often surprises people beginning psychotherapy.

The problem is rarely a lack of insight.

Many patients understand their history exceptionally well.

They know why they struggle to trust.

They know where their fear of rejection began.

They can often describe, with impressive clarity, the experiences that shaped them.

Yet nothing seems to change.

This can feel deeply discouraging.

“If I understand it,” patients sometimes ask, “why do I keep doing it?”

It is an important question.

Insight is not unimportant. It matters enormously.

But understanding a system is not the same as living differently within it.

Anyone who has tried to change a lifelong habit understands this instinctively. Knowing that something is harmful does not automatically alter the emotional forces that maintain it. Knowledge and transformation are related, but they are not identical.

Psychotherapy rarely changes people through explanation alone.

Instead, something quieter begins to happen.

The therapy room becomes a place where an existing emotional system is slowly experienced rather than simply described.

The familiar expectations appear between therapist and patient.

The fear of disappointing.

The certainty of being misunderstood.

The anticipation of criticism.

The longing to be rescued.

The wish to leave before being left.

These are not simply stories about other relationships.

Gradually, they become part of the relationship unfolding inside the consulting room itself.

This is where therapy begins to differ from advice, coaching or problem solving.

We are no longer discussing the system.

We are living inside it together.

There is one patient in particular who has stayed with me for many years.

To preserve confidentiality, I shall call him PC.

When we first met, he described the problems that had brought him to therapy in a thoughtful, intelligent and articulate way. Like many patients, he had spent years trying to understand himself. He had read extensively, reflected deeply and could speak about his childhood with considerable insight.

At first glance, it seemed as though much of the work had already been done.

Yet beneath that understanding something else remained untouched.

The same emotional conclusions continued to organise his life.

The same expectations quietly shaped each new relationship.

The same feelings returned with remarkable consistency, despite changes in circumstance.

As our work continued over the years, I gradually came to appreciate something that has since influenced my understanding of psychotherapy far beyond this single patient.

The stability of suffering is rarely maintained by ignorance.

More often, it is maintained because the emotional system believes that changing would be more dangerous than remaining exactly as it is.

That is not stubbornness.

It is not resistance in the everyday sense of the word.

It is loyalty to a way of surviving that was once necessary.

The remarkable thing is not that people find change difficult.

The remarkable thing is that they continue hoping for it, even while every part of them has learned that change may carry unbearable risk.

It is there, I have come to believe, that long-term psychotherapy truly begins.

When Nothing Seems to Change

One of the most difficult moments in psychotherapy often arrives several months into the work.

The initial relief of finally talking has faded. The patient has become familiar with the therapist. The therapist has become familiar with the patient.

Yet life outside the consulting room seems surprisingly unchanged.

The same arguments continue.

The same disappointments return.

The same anxieties appear each morning with almost perfect reliability.

Many people quietly begin to wonder whether therapy is working at all.

This uncertainty is understandable because we tend to think about change as something that should be visible.

If we begin exercising, we expect our bodies to become stronger.

If we study a language, we expect gradually to speak it more fluently.

Psychotherapy rarely follows such a straightforward path.

For long periods, it can feel as though nothing is happening.

Yet beneath the surface, something profoundly important may already be taking place.

When I first met PC, I was struck by his intelligence.

He had thought carefully about his life.

He had reflected on his childhood.

He understood many of the links between his early experiences and his adult relationships.

There was very little I could tell him that he had not already considered for himself.

For a young therapist, this can feel unexpectedly disorientating.

If the patient already understands so much, what exactly is the therapist meant to contribute?

Over time I discovered that this question was asking the wrong thing.

Psychotherapy is not primarily about providing new information.

It is about creating conditions in which a different emotional experience becomes possible.

That sounds deceptively simple.

In reality, it requires extraordinary patience from both people.

One of the greatest gifts British psychoanalytic theory has given us is the recognition that understanding develops within relationships.

Wilfred Bion suggested that thinking itself begins when emotional experience can be held rather than immediately evacuated.

An infant does not learn to think alone.

They first borrow the mind of another.

A frightened baby cannot calm themselves through reason.

Instead, someone else receives the fear, survives it and returns it in a form that can gradually be tolerated.

Over hundreds and thousands of such moments, the child slowly develops the capacity to think about feelings instead of simply being overwhelmed by them.

When this process has been disrupted, emotional experiences often remain unprocessed.

They continue to circulate through adult life in surprisingly familiar forms.

The person who suddenly feels abandoned after a delayed text message is not simply reacting to the present.

The intensity often belongs to many earlier moments that were never fully thought about because there was no one available to help think them.

This is one reason why psychotherapy cannot be reduced to advice.

Advice addresses conscious problems.

Therapy often works with experiences that have never become fully conscious in the first place.

Over the years, I began to notice something about PC that changed my own way of listening.

Whenever we approached emotionally significant territory, the conversation would become more organised.

More rational.

More coherent.

He became an exceptionally good observer of his own experience.

And paradoxically, this very clarity sometimes moved us further away from the feelings themselves.

It was not deliberate.

Nor was it dishonest.

It was simply the way his mind had learned to create safety.

Some people protect themselves through silence.

Others through humour.

Others by changing the subject.

PC often protected himself by becoming brilliantly thoughtful.

The feelings remained just out of reach.

Had I been interested only in insight, I might have congratulated him.

Instead, I gradually realised that his intelligence had become part of the emotional architecture that allowed unbearable experiences to remain carefully contained.

The mind was working perfectly.

It was simply working in the service of survival rather than transformation.

This became one of the most important lessons of my clinical life.

Our greatest strengths sometimes begin as our most necessary defences.

Patients often ask whether defence mechanisms are unhealthy.

I have never found that to be a helpful question.

Without defences, none of us would survive childhood.

The issue is not whether we develop them.

We all do.

The question is whether the solutions that once protected us continue to limit us decades later.

The child who became endlessly self-reliant because nobody came to comfort them may become the adult who cannot ask for help, even when surrounded by people who genuinely care.

The child who learned to anticipate everyone else’s needs may become the partner who has lost all sense of their own desires.

The child who survived through achievement may become the executive who cannot stop working because stillness feels strangely dangerous.

The defence itself is not the problem.

The tragedy is that life changes while the defence remains frozen in time.

There were sessions with PC that, if judged from the outside, would have appeared entirely uneventful.

We spoke.

We reflected.

Sometimes there were long silences.

Sometimes neither of us felt particularly certain where the session was going.

In our culture, productivity is often measured by visible outcomes.

Something should happen.

Something should be solved.

Psychotherapy gently resists this pressure.

There are sessions during which almost nothing appears to move.

Yet afterwards, both therapist and patient may discover that something subtle has shifted.

A sentence lingers.

A silence acquires meaning.

A feeling that was previously intolerable becomes slightly more bearable.

These changes are rarely dramatic.

But they accumulate.

Rather like water slowly reshaping stone, they alter the emotional landscape through persistence rather than force.

Patients often underestimate these apparently insignificant moments.

Therapists sometimes do too.

Looking back over years of work, however, it is often impossible to identify one decisive interpretation that changed everything.

Instead, change seems to emerge from hundreds of ordinary meetings during which two people continued thinking together, even when neither knew exactly where the thinking would eventually lead.

This, perhaps, is one of the greatest misunderstandings about long-term psychotherapy.

People imagine that therapists possess answers.

They imagine moments of profound interpretation that suddenly unlock years of suffering.

Occasionally such moments do occur.

But they are much rarer than popular culture suggests.

More often, psychotherapy resembles something quieter.

It is the repeated experience of discovering that another human being remains emotionally present, even when the conversation becomes confused, painful or uncertain.

For someone whose early emotional world was marked by inconsistency, absence or fear, this repeated experience is not merely comforting.

It is psychologically transformative.

Not because the therapist is extraordinary.

But because the relationship gradually offers something the emotional system had never fully expected to find.

Reliability.

And reliability, repeated over time, slowly becomes thinkable.

As the years passed, I found myself becoming less interested in whether PC had changed.

Instead, I became curious about something else.

Was he beginning to experience himself differently?

That may sound like a small distinction.

In psychotherapy, it is often the distinction that matters most.

The Relationship That Slowly Changes the Mind

One of the assumptions people often bring to psychotherapy is that change happens because the therapist says something insightful.

Occasionally, that does happen.

A sentence lands at exactly the right moment. A patient pauses. Something that has been hidden suddenly becomes visible.

Those moments are memorable.

But they are not, in my experience, what most often changes lives.

The deeper changes are usually quieter.

They emerge through the experience of being with another mind that continues to think, to remain curious and to stay emotionally available, even when neither person knows where the work is leading.

This is difficult to describe because it does not resemble ordinary conversation.

In everyday life we usually speak to exchange information, solve problems or persuade one another.

Psychotherapy has a different purpose.

We are trying to understand how a person experiences themselves while they are in relationship with another human being.

That means the relationship itself inevitably becomes part of the work.

Over time, every long-term therapeutic relationship develops its own emotional language.

Not simply the words that are spoken.

The pauses.

The moments when someone looks away.

The slight hesitation before answering a question.

The forgotten session.

The dream that arrives unexpectedly after weeks of feeling emotionally flat.

The apology that seems disproportionate to what happened.

The relief when the therapist is still there after a difficult meeting.

None of these moments are remarkable in isolation.

Together, however, they begin to reveal the emotional logic that has organised a person’s inner world for decades.

Patterns that were previously invisible become visible because they are no longer being described.

They are happening.

I often think that psychotherapy asks both patient and therapist to tolerate not knowing.

This is harder than it sounds.

We live in a culture that values certainty.

We search for explanations.

We like conclusions.

Yet emotional life rarely unfolds in such a tidy way.

Patients sometimes apologise because they feel they have “nothing to talk about.”

In reality, those sessions can be among the richest.

The absence of narrative often allows something else to emerge.

A feeling without words.

A vague restlessness.

An unexpected sadness that neither of us fully understands.

If we can resist the temptation to explain too quickly, those moments often become the beginning of genuine discovery.

Bion wrote about approaching each session “without memory or desire.”

I have always understood this less as an instruction to forget the patient than as a reminder to remain open.

If we become too attached to what we already know, we stop noticing what is unfolding in front of us.

Patients change.

Therapists change.

The relationship changes.

Every session asks us to meet one another again.

There were times in my work with PC when I became aware of my own wish to make things better.

Not simply to understand him.

To help.

To relieve the burden.

To find the interpretation that might finally loosen a pattern that had remained unchanged for years.

These wishes are entirely human.

They are also dangerous if they become more important than listening.

Early in my career I probably believed that good therapists helped people by finding the right words.

Years later, I have become less certain.

Sometimes our urgency belongs more to us than to the patient.

It reflects our discomfort with witnessing suffering that cannot be quickly relieved.

Patients often teach therapists this lesson repeatedly.

Healing cannot be rushed simply because we wish it could.

The emotional system unfolds according to its own rhythm.

Respecting that rhythm is one of the quiet disciplines of psychotherapy.

Looking back now, I realise that PC taught me as much about patience as any supervisor ever did.

Not because he resisted therapy.

On the contrary.

He attended faithfully.

He reflected deeply.

He thought seriously about the work.

Yet his inner world could not simply be persuaded into becoming different.

It had been organised over an entire lifetime.

Why should it reorganise itself in a matter of months?

This question gradually altered my expectations of psychotherapy itself.

Instead of asking, “How can I produce change?”

I found myself asking a different question.

“What conditions allow change to become possible?”

The difference is subtle but profound.

One question places the therapist at the centre.

The other places the relationship there.

Donald Winnicott famously described psychotherapy as taking place where two people are able to play together.

At first, I found this a curious idea.

Therapy often feels serious.

People speak about grief, trauma, shame and despair.

Where is the play?

Only gradually did I understand that Winnicott was not referring to games or amusement.

He was describing a psychological freedom.

The ability to wonder.

To imagine.

To hold more than one possibility at the same time.

People whose emotional worlds have become organised around survival often lose this capacity.

Everything feels fixed.

Relationships are experienced as predictable.

“I know how this will end.”

“I know you will leave.”

“I know I’ll disappoint you.”

“I know I’m too much.”

These conclusions do not feel like beliefs.

They feel like facts.

One of the quiet achievements of psychotherapy is that certainty slowly begins to soften.

Not because the therapist argues against it.

Because another emotional experience has been lived for long enough to become believable.

A different possibility enters the room.

Perhaps I don’t know.

Perhaps there is another way this relationship can unfold.

Perhaps my expectations, while understandable, are not the whole story.

Psychological change often begins with that single word.

Perhaps.

People sometimes ask me how long psychotherapy should last.

There is no universal answer.

Some people come for a few months.

Others for several years.

The question is less about time than about what is still unfolding.

Certain aspects of ourselves reveal themselves only within enduring relationships.

Trust itself requires time.

So does disappointment.

So does repair.

A relationship that survives misunderstanding teaches something that cannot be taught intellectually.

It demonstrates that closeness does not require perfection.

For many patients, that is an entirely new emotional experience.

As the years of work with PC accumulated, another thought began to emerge.

One that I had not expected.

The relationship was changing both of us.

Not in the same way.

Not equally.

But inevitably.

No therapist spends years listening carefully to another human life without also being quietly shaped by it.

The consulting room is never occupied by only one developing mind.

There are always two.

When people imagine psychotherapy, they often picture a patient gradually becoming healthier.

That certainly happens.

What is spoken about less often is that therapists continue developing too.

Every patient leaves something behind.

Not an interpretation.

Not a theory.

A way of seeing.

A way of listening.

A deeper appreciation of what it costs another person to remain emotionally alive.

I sometimes think that the true curriculum of psychotherapy is written not in textbooks, but in relationships that unfold patiently over years.

It is there that both therapist and patient slowly become capable of thinking thoughts that neither could have thought alone.

What Endures

The longer I have practised psychotherapy, the less interested I have become in dramatic change.

This may sound surprising.

After all, people come to therapy because they hope that something in their lives will be different.

And often it is.

Relationships become less conflictual.

Anxiety becomes more manageable.

People begin making different choices.

They become kinder to themselves.

They discover capacities they had not believed they possessed.

These changes matter enormously.

But when I look back over many years of clinical work, I find myself thinking about something else.

I think about continuity.

Not the continuity of symptoms.

The continuity of relationship.

When we first meet a patient, we inevitably imagine that one day the work will end.

Sometimes it does.

Sometimes life interrupts.

Sometimes people leave because they feel ready.

Sometimes they leave because they are not.

Sometimes they return years later.

Sometimes they never do.

Every ending has its own emotional truth.

Yet something curious happens in long-term psychotherapy.

As the years pass, the relationship itself becomes part of the patient’s internal world.

The therapist gradually becomes less someone who is physically present and more someone whose way of thinking begins to accompany the patient beyond the consulting room.

Patients often describe hearing the therapist’s voice—not literally, but as a remembered way of approaching experience.

“What might we have thought about this together?”

That question marks an important moment.

The work is no longer confined to the fifty-minute session.

The relationship has begun to live inside the patient.

British psychoanalytic theory has long understood this process as internalisation.

To me, however, it has always felt less technical than that.

Perhaps we simply carry one another.

Not completely.

Not permanently.

But enough to make solitude feel less absolute.

The older I become, the more I find myself reflecting on this quiet process.

When I was younger, I was naturally preoccupied with helping patients change.

Today I remain deeply committed to that hope.

But I have also come to appreciate something I understood much less clearly at the beginning of my career.

Psychotherapy unfolds within time.

Not only within the patient’s life.

Within the therapist’s life as well.

The years pass for both of us.

We experience our own losses.

Our own disappointments.

Our own ageing.

Our own encounters with uncertainty.

None of this is brought into the consulting room as biography.

Yet it inevitably deepens our capacity to recognise something of the patient’s humanity.

The work becomes less about expertise.

More about companionship in thinking.

Looking back, I sometimes smile at the unexpected continuity of my own professional life.

For many years I believed I had lived several entirely different careers.

Engineering.

International technology.

Business development.

Psychotherapy.

They seemed unrelated.

Now they appear connected by a single thread.

Each involved sitting with people facing problems that initially seemed impossible to solve.

Each required listening carefully before speaking.

Each depended upon curiosity more than certainty.

And each taught me that complex systems rarely respond well to force.

Whether we are trying to stabilise an engineering system or understand an emotional life, lasting change rarely comes from imposing control.

It emerges from understanding the relationships that allow the system to organise itself differently.

Perhaps that is why psychotherapy has always felt strangely familiar to me.

The questions changed.

The mathematics disappeared.

The human complexity became infinitely greater.

But the discipline of careful observation remained remarkably similar.

When I think of PC now, I do not think first about diagnoses or formulations.

I think about two people who spent years trying to understand a life together.

There were conversations that neither of us could have predicted.

Periods that felt productive.

Others that felt uncertain.

Moments of frustration.

Moments of recognition.

Long stretches during which change seemed almost invisible.

Then, quietly, something would reveal itself that neither of us had noticed while it was happening.

This has become one of my deepest convictions about psychotherapy.

The most important changes often become visible only in retrospect.

Much like watching a child grow, we rarely notice the transformation while we are living through it.

It is only when we look back that we realise someone has become different.

People occasionally ask what makes psychotherapy effective.

Research offers many valuable answers.

The quality of the therapeutic relationship.

Consistency.

Trust.

Emotional safety.

Shared understanding.

These are all important.

My own answer has gradually become both simpler and more difficult.

Psychotherapy works because, over time, two minds become capable of thinking together about experiences that previously had to be carried alone.

The suffering itself may not disappear.

Life continues to include grief, disappointment, illness, separation and loss.

Psychotherapy does not protect us from being human.

What it can do is transform how we live our humanity.

Experiences that once felt unspeakable gradually become speakable.

Feelings that once overwhelmed us become thinkable.

Relationships that once felt impossibly dangerous become, at least occasionally, places of genuine safety.

The external world may remain uncertain.

Our internal world becomes less frightening.

There is another thought that has stayed with me.

One that I suspect becomes increasingly important as therapists grow older.

Every patient entrusts us with something profoundly precious.

Not simply their history.

Their unfinished life.

Their hopes.

Their fears.

Their memories.

Their capacity to trust another person once again.

That trust is never something to be taken for granted.

It is received.

Protected.

Thought about.

And eventually, one hopes, returned in a form that allows the patient to continue carrying it for themselves.

In that sense, psychotherapy is not only about insight.

Nor is it simply about symptom relief.

It is an act of stewardship.

For a time, another human being allows us to help hold parts of their emotional world that have become too heavy to carry alone.

Our task is not to carry them forever.

It is to help make them bearable enough that they can gradually be reclaimed.

When I first began this article, I thought I was writing about change.

About why emotional patterns become so remarkably stable.

About what one patient had taught me over many years of psychotherapy.

I realise now that the article has been about something rather different.

It has been about relationship.

Because it is relationship that first shapes the mind.

Relationship that wounds it.

Relationship that protects it.

And, perhaps most remarkably, relationship that allows it to grow again.

For all our theories, our models and our carefully chosen interpretations, I have come to believe that psychotherapy ultimately rests on something both ordinary and extraordinary.

Two people meet.

Again and again.

They remain curious together.

They think together.

They survive misunderstanding.

They tolerate uncertainty.

They discover that neither has to know everything immediately.

Slowly, almost imperceptibly, the emotional system that once organised itself entirely around survival begins to discover another possibility.

Not certainty.

Not perfection.

Simply the growing confidence that another mind can remain present without overwhelming, abandoning or demanding that we become someone else.

Perhaps that is the deepest form of stability we can ever hope to find.